T20 World Cup Cricket

What will be the winners from the state when they emerge victorious from the tournament this month? It can be a strange question, but think about how it would be absurd in any other sport. Imagine being called that six months after the FIFA World Cup, a tournament, even the World Cup, with more or less the same bring the field team played more or less the same players in the tournament with a format very similar audience very similar (both motifs and television), But with 45 minutes of games instead of 90

I am in no way affect the existence of T20, because I love cricket, and I understand that this ultra-intense, short format of the game means that people can see a whole game in one evening after work, the game still gives more attractive, more coverage, more hours leading advertising opportunities and thus more money. It's a great show.

I just think its odd, if there will be two world champions> Cricket.

Test cricket, are of course a very different kettle of fish and game tactics completely different than the game one day. The duration of the games take time, and the possibility of massive extraction, it means that a classification is the only way to "the world number one team to produce ', while 50 overs-a-side is suitable for certain results in a finite time 20-20 50-50 in the tournament is very similar to his style and philosophy. score as many runs as possiblequickly as possible, the number of runs greed, as you can. It can also be played in a tournament, and that is why we have the 'World Cup' this very second.

The winners will then claim to world champions of cricket, and the best in the abbreviated version of the game. But the team from Australia, who lifted the World Cup is in the West Indies claim a few months now, that title. And "Twenty20 World Championship" in reality means nothing, at least not yet: T20 are so few playedinternationally (England have the most in history with a total of six teams, India have played only 2) that no one really cares. In addition, the games are so short that a mediocre international team lift the trophy imaginable. The deficiencies in the Zimbabwe side could perhaps be papered over three hours at a time, which would certainly lead to a collapse more than a day or more. What happens when a "small fish" wins everything? They played so rarely from the Test nationsThe label "World Champion" will be redundant until you play the tournament again.

One solution would be an annual or biennial tournament T20, T20 is outside the international will not play. Then it is clear that the T20, while popular and important is not the same caliber and class as the Cricket World Cup official, in the same way that the Six Nations will be challenged greatly every year, but with the side of the Winner makes no claims of globalSuperiority. Perhaps the difficulties disappear T20 is its niche. But this time, the easiest solution to avoid any confusion or arguments, it would be if Australia had won the danged thing. To impose no doubt it will.

Source: http://sports-cricket.chailit.com/t20-world-cup-cricket-2.html

tofu mac book air mac book air intc wps macbook air holiday inn express